LogixLoops
The same feature list costs wildly different amounts depending on what it has to plug into, which is why nobody honest can put a price on this page. What we can do is show you the two ways to engage, what drives the number, and exactly when you get a firm one.
A web application with real users, real data, and somebody's revenue running through it.
iOS and Android, built offline-first because the network is not your user's problem.
The pipeline, the evaluation set and the fallback, not just the model call.
Moving off a system you cannot switch off, without switching it off.
Final figures come out of technical discovery and architectural mapping, and are based on your requirements rather than on a template. Nobody is asked to commit to a number before they have seen the brief it is attached to.
Not the feature count. Every quote we send breaks down against these three, so you can see which one is expensive and decide whether you want to pay for it.
How hard the problem genuinely is. Throughput, consistency requirements, and whether the interesting part is the algorithm or the plumbing around it.
Every system we have to talk to that we do not control. This is the single most underestimated line in software estimates, every time.
A compressed timeline means parallel tracks and more coordination overhead per unit of output. Speed is buyable. It is just not free.
Pick by how much of the problem is already understood. Both carry the same delivery commitments, and both end with you owning everything.
A standing team billed on a flat monthly retainer. You get fixed capacity and velocity with no hourly timesheets. Best when the roadmap is long and the requirements will keep moving.
A fixed figure against a written architecture brief, delivered in phases. Best when the outcome is well defined, a migration, a launch, a compliance deadline.
Because the same feature list costs wildly different amounts depending on what it has to plug into. Your existing architecture, your integration surface and your deadline move the number far more than anything on a rate card does, and quoting before we have seen those three would mean padding the figure to cover what we do not know. You get a written price after technical discovery, before any commitment.
Three months. Most enterprise transformations run six to twelve. Anything shorter does not leave room to understand the system, ship something that matters, and hand it over responsibly, and we would rather decline than do a rushed version of all three.
A flat monthly retainer that buys a fixed team capacity. There are no hourly timesheets to argue about at the end of the month, and the cost does not move when a sprint runs hot. You are buying reserved capacity, not hours.
After discovery and architectural mapping, which is the first paid phase. That phase produces a written brief covering the proposed stack, service boundaries, delivery phases and known risks. The quote attaches to that brief and is fixed for the scope it describes.
Yes, all of it. We build only on open-source, industry-standard frameworks, so at the end of the engagement you keep 100% of the IP, the source and the infrastructure configuration. There is no proprietary LogixLoops runtime to keep paying for, and replacing us is a staffing decision rather than a rewrite.
Working software every two weeks from Sprint 1, architecture documentation, test coverage, CI/CD pipelines and a production handover with runbooks. Ongoing monitoring, security patching and performance work sit outside that, under a separate support agreement, because they are a different commitment with a different cost.
More on how we run delivery, or see the full FAQ.